HomeArabArtFinanceEducationLebanonMediaMiddle EastPersonal Politics ReligionScienceSocietyTechnologyUSAWorld

Tarek Hoteit Notebook    profile|contact

« Home | Ongoing human evolution could explain recent rise ... » | Charles Darwin: More than the origin » | Nanoscience goes 'big': Discovery could lead to en... » | Smashing Myths and Restoring Sound Money (Ludwig v... » | Ludwig von Mises Institute :The History of Economi... » | Markets: Bubble warning | The Economist » | BBC News - Cleopatra's eye make-up 'had health ben... » | Sanafer Open » | sasoki » | Sandy Jonquille - Generique »

ScienceDaily: Can we trust the results of research done on children?

"ScienceDaily (Jan. 11, 2010) — New research finds that flawed medical research could lead to children receiving treatment that either doesn't work or is harmful.

Lisa Hartling, co-director for the University of Alberta's Alberta Research Centre for Health Evidence, looked at 163 North American clinical trials involving children by using a new tool that rates the risk of bias, meaning the benefits and safety of the treatments may have been exaggerated. She found that 96 per cent of the trials have either an unclear or high risk of bias. This means children could be receiving treatments that either don't work or are harmful. It could also mean children are not receiving treatment that may help.

In a paper recently published in the British Medical Journal, Hartling says some faulty research factors contributing to bias include selective reporting, inappropriate influence by the study sponsor or missing data."

read complete article : Can we trust the results of research done on children?

Labels:

Twitter

    follow me on Twitter
    Tarek Hoteit